Your favourite character is a psychopath
Many thanks to Tina for her kind invitation to contribute to this unique blog. I hope to prove worthy of her trust and to share something valuable with the people here. If nothing else, y’all can use me as a lab rat.
Have you noticed how psychopaths are everywhere at the moment? Fictional psychopaths that is; on television, at the movies, and in webseries. Take a moment; I’m sure you’ll come up with a few examples. If there is something we can all agree on, it’s that screen psychopaths are always the villains, right? And they come in two flavours, those magnificent bastards we love to hate (think Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker, Sherlock’s Jim Moriarty, that relentless and merciless assassin from No Country for Old Men) and the monsters that haunt your nightmares (Hannibal Lecter, Norman Bates, any slasher movie antagonist). These are two character types with which we are all familiar, so familiar in fact that when we think of psychopaths, these are the people who pop into our heads. They are the seen as the authentic onscreen representation of psychopaths. End of story?
Well, no. The truth is Lecter, Moriarty et al are not very realistic depictions (even the slightly more normal real life murderers the likes of Hannibal were inspired by are one in a million in their savagery), and in terms of the full list of screen psychopaths, they are just the tip of the iceberg. You don’t have to tune into the Horror Channel to get your psychopath fix anymore. Neither do you need to confine yourselves to big budget action blockbusters about daring heroes foiling a psychopath’s plot for world domination or Law and Order-type procedural dramas. If you know what to look for, you will find psychopathic characters in many different screen productions, and not just in villain roles. There are realistic psychopathic protagonists, in more shows than you might think.
These days, a myriad of films and television programmes features psychopathic characters that are not necessarily the heroes, but are certainly not the stereotyped supervillain or super-creep. We might consider half the cast of American Horror Story and many of the True Blood vampires to fall into this bracket. Cartoons are particularly noted for such characters; Eric Cartman, Roger the Alien, Bender the robot and Mr Burns are all psychopathic for our entertainment and are hilarious in doing so. These cartoon characters are even less realistic than the traditional screen psychopaths, but since they inhabit animated universes, their antics are meant to be outrageous and unbelievable.
So far, we have mainly looked at characters that, despite being famous psychopaths in their own right, are little more than caricatures of what is a complex condition. Now, we are going to turn our attention to a different type of screen psychopath that couldn’t be more popular with the viewing public at the moment.
Let’s look at some of the recent television phenomena that have been hailed as the big players of TV’s new ‘golden age’ against the backdrop of a fragmentation of traditional viewing habits and a creatively stagnating Hollywood. It is said to have all started with The Wire (a gritty crime show about the continued struggle between psychopathic criminals and psychopathic police officers) and Mad Men (a period drama whose protagonist is Don Draper, a psychopath). Then came Walter White psychopath-gets-cancer-and-becomes-a-meth-baron, in the smash hit Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones (where almost every character of importance exhibits strong psychopathic traits and the philosophy espoused by the show is one of cutthroat Machiavellianism) and most recently House of Cards, a thriller that is not only Game of Thrones for the real world but focusses on the exploits of the very sort of politician this blog campaigns against.
What’s interesting about the psychopaths in these shows is they are:
- the protagonists with whom the viewer is supposed to identify and support;
- humanised in their personalities and realistic in their goals and behaviour;
- not acknowledged as psychopaths, either in-universe or by the shows’ creators.
I won’t pretend this kind of character is new. JR Ewing, Tony Soprano and even James Bond (a character with whom I share more than just a first name and nationality, or so it would seem) were psychopathic protagonists long before it was ‘cool’. But they were outliers. The whole point is this type of character is everywhere now, and not only more popular than ever, but more popular than the myriad of non-psychopath characters. So there you have it, the main characters on the most watched television shows of our era are psychopaths, and you didn’t even know it.
This fact begs the question… why? Psychopaths are clearly not popular in the real world. Among the most hated and feared groups of our society, perhaps only paedophiles and Nazis have a poorer reputation. Yet stick a psychopath on the screen, don’t tell anybody he’s a psychopath and watch the viewing figures soar. The suspiciously-minded among us (and anyone with some degree of intelligence should be suspicious; you should always question assumptions) may chalk the psychopath’s media ubiquity down to a deliberate attempt to normalise psychopathic behaviour; to push the psychopath agenda, if you like. It is certainly possible that all this TV exposure may have a slight normalising effect on public perception of psychopathy, but there are three good reasons to discount a conspiracy. Firstly, psychopaths are so inherently self-interested that the collaborative effort required by hundred or thousands of them to orchestrate such a conspiracy is unrealistic. Secondly, while the shows may not draw attention to the fact that they are populated by psychopaths, they certainly don’t treat the characters’ behaviour with moral indifference. These are meant to be controversial, amoral, exciting characters but there is no suggestion that viewers ought to emulate or idealise them or their behaviour. Lastly and perhaps most importantly, the simplest explanation for something is 9 times out of 10 the most likely. Therefore most likely explanation for the psychopath phenomenon is, I would posit, there is viewer demand for such characters. These characters are on our television screens, online and in the cinema because we enjoy them, not the other way around.
This conclusion raises further questions, which I will not go into here but would be keen to tackle in a future post, if the admin would be so kind as to allow me back: just why are so many viewers entertained, thrilled, humoured by fictional psychopaths, and what is it about these characters with which people identify?
For now, let’s wrap this mini-essay up with a prediction. That the ubiquity of psychopathic characters is a recent phenomenon suggests that there will be a point when they will fall out of favour. After all, a few years ago it was all about vampires, macho cops had had their day by the early 80s and near-future sci-fi utopias belong firmly in the 1960s. Nowadays it’s psychopaths that are in vogue. And zombies of course, thanks to AMC. So it seems reasonable to suggest that sooner or later the next big thing will come along and the psychopaths will crawl back to their traditional haunts of horror films and endless reruns of CSI.
James 01:45 on April 3, 2015 Permalink |
Comments are welcomed and indeed encourage. I promise not to be a dick.
LikeLiked by 1 person
idodoyouride 11:59 on April 9, 2015 Permalink |
Lol good
LikeLike
@GeneticPsycho (Tina) 19:41 on April 24, 2015 Permalink |
The favorite characters in my real life are psychopaths as well. (And I watch lots of cartoons.) Actually, one psychopath I dated acted like Peter from Family Guy, only more obnoxious. I found that shit funny as hell. In fact, he had no redeeming qualities except that he made me laugh hysterically. Psychopaths make great entertainment.
LikeLike
James 19:50 on April 24, 2015 Permalink |
“He had no redeeming qualities…” And you dated him?
LikeLike
@GeneticPsycho (Tina) 20:10 on April 24, 2015 Permalink |
For the lolz
LikeLiked by 1 person
@GeneticPsycho (Tina) 20:21 on April 24, 2015 Permalink |
I have the annoying habit of being able to love people who aren’t perfect.
LikeLike
James 20:21 on April 24, 2015 Permalink |
Nobody’s perfect, dear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@GeneticPsycho (Tina) 20:23 on April 24, 2015 Permalink |
Exactly why I shouldn’t be allowed to date. lol
LikeLike
Jay Jones 03:25 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Hi James. My name is Jay, I am also a psychopath and author on the subject, as you may be aware. I see you guys have quoted my blog, facebook group and quora writings. Also my friend Zhawq. Reading your articles was that familiar reflection we tend to get when reading the first hand account of another psychopath.
My main reason for contacting you, is I am wondering why you are writing here? from what I can see, this site is set up against psychopaths. Anyway, if you are interested in working with a growing international network of psychopaths, spreading awareness and working together formutual benefit, drop me a line. Jay
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 03:58 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Thanks Jay, for the ‘initiation’. I will check you guys out, at some point.
Yes, this site is very much against psychopaths. I’m here to balance things out a bit. There’s nothing quite like preaching to a hostile crowd.
LikeLiked by 1 person
nowve666 13:37 on November 26, 2015 Permalink |
Hi, Jay. I have been part of The Psychopathy Network for a few months. I like your picture and introductory remarks at the top of this section (of Facebook). I wish you were more present in the group. A lot of folks miss you but don’t want to say where you are. I have links to your blog from my blog https://kiasherosjourney.wordpress.com/2015/08/17/hello-world/ and my web site http://www.kiasherosjourney.com.
LikeLike
Amaterasu Solar 08:53 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Perhaps the reason for psychopaths is that Their behavior choices are so good for creating controversy in a story line. Take out the psychopaths and the story becomes quite dull. EveryOne agreeing, cooperating, caring. Nice to watch, for non-psychopaths perhaps, for a few moments, but not going anywhere really. About the only thing that can create controversy other than a psychopath (Human, robot, ET, spirit, whatever) is a natural catastrophe, and even then, add a psychopath and the situation turns more interesting.
Personally, I don’t fear psychopaths, feeling a great deal of sadness that They are denied the experience of love. I wouldn’t believe I can change a One of Them, though My heart would truly want to try. The best I can hope for is mutual… Not respect, because I don’t expect that from Them. Mutual wariness, perhaps. [smile]
Interesting that in the article You state that conspiracy is out of the question with psychopaths, and yet… Here We see one psychopath offering You an invite to… A network of psychopaths working together.
Hmmmm. What can We take away from that?
And truly, James, I am not hostile at all. I am interested in Your perspective in hopes of finding a way to sell psychopaths on the abundance paradigm. Because if I can, I’m likely to go further faster with My work. In fact, would You look at the opening post here and let Me know if there is anything You like about it?
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/40/abundance-paradigm-me
I thank You for considering accommodating My request. [smile]
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 09:09 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Yes, of course I will. Not right now though. If I haven’t commented in a few days, feel free to give me a nudge 🙂
As far as I can see, anyone is free to join Jay’s group, not just psychopaths, so if there is any conspiracy, it is on public display. Why don’t you go and see for yourself?
On the contrary, I can and do respect some others. Perhaps not in the same way as you respect people, but I would certainly call it respect. I am not at all wary of you, in case you were wondering 😉
Finally, to your comment on my article (I appear to be working backwards here!), very good remarks, though I think you’ve missed one crucial point. Psychopaths are not the only people capable of creating drama. Neurotypicals can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape etc… with the best of them, just perhaps not as much as psychopaths. Don’t pretend that all you guys do all day is sit around agreeing and loving! And normal people suffer moral crises, remorse, worries and all that jazz, which add an extra dimension to the drama than just remorseless ‘evil’.
I’m not sure when I’m going to return to this topic and write part 2, but it will happen at some point.
LikeLike
Amaterasu Solar 09:18 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
No rush.
I may join, but My time is a bit thin. I’m active on many sites already, but this may pique My motivation enough. [smile]
I never said You could not feel respect. I said I don’t expect that ability from a psychopath.
I never suggested that non-psychopaths never created controversy. But psychopaths do create the most interesting controversy, and in a story, the more interesting the more sales, n’est pas? Ergo the inclusion in high quantities of psychopaths in Our entertainment media.
Hope to see You soon. [smile]
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 10:03 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
“I never said You could not feel respect. I said I don’t expect that ability from a psychopath.” Very true. I appreciate pedantry, as you will see in a moment.
“I never suggested that non-psychopaths never created controversy.” I think you did: “Take out the psychopaths and the story becomes quite dull. EveryOne agreeing, cooperating, caring.” Ergo there is no drama without psychopaths. It’s okay to change your mind, but don’t pretend that’s what you were saying all along. That’s the kind of trick I use…
“N’est-ce pas ?” Don’t talk to me in French if you don’t know your demonstrative pronouns! D’accord ? 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amaterasu Solar 10:47 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Fair enough. I agree I was not clear on what I was trying to say and it did seem to imply no drama.
As for the French… I’ll speak it – well or poorly – as I see fit. [grin] I like “foreign” languages and wish I retained what I learned of all the ones I studied way back when.
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 11:10 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Donc, tu parles quelles autres langues, alors ? Moi aussi, j’aime bien les langues comme toi; je m’intéresse en turc, gallois, italien, russe, allemand, latin… mais la seule autre que je sais parler est l’espagnol.
There’s always Google if you don’t understand everything 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 18:22 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Of course I like the idea of being completely free, though I wouldn’t like to be constrained by those ethics 🙂
I’m not clear on the mechanics of the abundance paradigm. How does it work?
Would it be untrue of me to call you a Marxist?
LikeLike
Amaterasu Solar 18:39 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Basically, We stop accounting for energy. That is all money is: an accounting device for Our energy added. We build robots, open-source, for all necessary work no One wants to do. If there are enough People, no robots needed. Most of today’s jobs are non-productive and serve only to keep the bulk of the wealth on this planet flowing to very few. They are all unneeded jobs. Cashiers, sales, accounting, marketing, advertising, insurance, Wall Street, actuarial, and, of course, all of banking.
We only need about 10% of Us doing the work of ensuring supply meets demand.
I am an Abudancist. A Marxist will expect energy input from all able bodies – which makes sense in an energy-scarce society. With free energy and robots, We won’t have to force, coerce, or bribe (“pay”) People to do work that needs to be done.
Also, so far, in applied Marxism, there has been a top-down control mechanism – a central body making choices for the rest. This “inner party” has the privileges of “elite,” while the rest bead the brunt.
In Abundancism, there is no controlmind, with bottom-up stigmergic governance via the web, solving problems within Ethics, not passing “laws.”
As far as Ethics goes, there is little motive to break the three Laws in The Abundance Paradigm (TAP), even for a psychopath, unless the psychopath is just thrilled to be a dick. In which case, They lose social currency.
For more, the foundational writings are here:
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/2/abundance-paradigm-foundational-writings
LikeLike
James 18:48 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Interesting. So let’s take one example. How do I feed myself? (i.e. where does the food come from, how do I ensure it gets it get to my plate?)
LikeLike
Amaterasu Solar 19:12 on May 9, 2015 Permalink |
Starting with the presumption that We have built the robots and the system is up and running, You go to the web and type in, say, lettuces. Up comes a list of all the lettuces available, both from robotic and Human operated farms. You make Your selection and it is delivered either by robot, or less likely, a Human whose life ambition is to deliver things.
Or You could have a robot keep You stocked with staples, and You ask it to order You what You want above and beyond those, if You love to do the cooking Yourself.
Or… You could choose to farm Your own, if You’re so inclined.
Or pick up what a local farmer’s cornucopia offers, where Us Humans who love to farm can show off proudly what We have coaxed from the soils of Our planet, and give it to Humans who appreciate Our labors of love. Will guess few psychopaths will be pursuing farming, but… Who knows?
Or You could create menus and leave it up to the robots to do the shopping and cooking. And serving at Your banquet table, if that’s Your style.
Or You could go out to eat at the many places, where People who LOVE to cook for Others, where They offer Their gourmet fare. You may need reservations if They are particularly popular.
Or possible approaches I can’t think of. What won’t happen is things like living off 1-2 meals a day because One has no transportation and must rely on busy friends, and so gets to the store once a month with $194 in food stamps.
Unless One is fond of living like that, in which case, One can knock Oneself out. For Me, personally, it’s seriously outside My comfort zone.
Did I answer Your question? Anything I can clarify?
LikeLike
Jay Jones 04:50 on May 10, 2015 Permalink |
Good to see you out there fighting for our cause. Be good to see you link up with us, together we can do great things. Our time is coming. Cheers mate
LikeLike
Psychopaths in Song | No Psychos, No Druggies, No Stooges 10:02 on May 29, 2015 Permalink |
[…] they’re everywhere. At work. In government. On the telly. And in music, too. There are many songs out there that were clearly written with psychopaths in […]
LikeLike