A man of wealth and taste
This isn’t going to be about anything much, so if you’re somebody who likes meaningful content in their blog posts, just skip this one over. Plenty more good stuff coming soon!
For those of you who have already read my shitty introduction to the blog (no, not the TV one from last week, the other shitty one), you’ll know that I have identified as a psychopath. I’m gonna say right now that I regret the way that initial conversation with Tina was conducted and especially dislike how quickly it turned disrespectful. That is not at all how I intend to interact with people on here.
So let’s start over. Hello, my name actually is James, no guessing required. I’m a twentysomething psychopath from the smallish island of Great Britain and I like all kinds of music, philosophy, travel, manipulation, excessive drinking, adrenaline sports, playing mind games, bullying the weak, scaring people in dark alleyways, pushing grannies down the stairs and long walks on the beach. At least one of those interests is a lie, can you guess which? I have a job and a life, but I’m not going to talk about those in this post, if at all.
A choice memory to share with you all: I was in year 7 or 8 of school, so about 12 or 13 years old. We had a few poor teachers, everyone does I think. There was one who was particularly bad, not at his subject I might add; he was very good at woodwork. You have to be good at a technical subject like that to get a job teaching it. No, his problem was classroom management; he was hopeless. If he told you to do something, you just wouldn’t do it. His classes were always chaotic and dangerous (we had saws and big electronic tools at our disposal). I was – am – the opposite of him: good at managing people, bad at woodwork. I was failing my project and had injured a few people in the process due to my general carelessness around the drills and soldering irons.
This hack of a teacher could see how bad I was and I knew he was going to fail me the year, but he had a weakness. Everyone does, you see, but his was a fun one. On top of this general incompetence, he had a nasty temper. When he didn’t get his way in controlling the class he would blow a fuse and have a kind of tantrum. He’d shout a lot, go very red and generally look quite ridiculous. And his body language promised the potential for violence, he just hadn’t yet been pushed enough.
To get rid of him, all I needed to do was to rile him up a bit more. Or rather get the idiots in my class to do it for me. So I told them he had confided to me how much he hated the class and the kids in it and he had plans to fail everyone that year. The genius of the lie that it was probably true (but he of course had said no such thing to me of all people) and just needed someone to point it out to get the kids worked up. I then suggested he should pay for this treachery with a particularly badly behaved class that afternoon, and that was what he got. I can’t remember exactly what happened but I know it started with us refusing to enter the classroom for the first 20 minutes of the lesson and it ended somewhat earlier than normal with the teacher throwing a box of tools at a student’s head before chucking somebody’s wood project out of the window and locking himself in the tech office. He was of course immediately suspended, I got the other kids to play the victim card for the post-breakdown inquiry, some of the girls even agreed to say he had touched them inappropriately, and I didn’t have to finish my stupid woodwork project.
That wasn’t the only time I drove a teacher from their classroom, but it was the most memorable. I don’t know, it’s probably not an entertaining a story as I find it still to be.
Anyhoo, you might be wondering quite how I found my way onto this blog, or why I continue to stick around, but frankly I’m none the wiser myself, so there are no answers forthcoming. The fact is that when I sat down to write this, I had no idea I was going to write about my school days; this was very much an improv deal. You can maybe surmise that I enjoy writing and want to transmit a few ideas with others that aren’t so easy to talk about in everyday life. If so, then I think you are probably right. Perhaps you suspect that I might be more than a little narcissistic and like the attention that comes from publishing online. That’s a safe bet too. Or maybe you just don’t care one jot. That’s okay too, it’s a free country. And it’s something I can relate to, so there’s that.
idodoyouride 09:51 on April 9, 2015 Permalink |
i had a history teacher like this, he couldnt control anyone we would sit in the back of his class and smoke pot, lol, he would get so irate and frustrated he stepped in the garbage can one day and got his foot caught , he went crazy and finally fell over almost crying. it was funny back then not so much now that i think about it. so are you a diagnosed psychopath????
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 12:03 on April 9, 2015 Permalink |
I would never put myself in a position where I could be diagnosed with anything. Even when I was 13 I had a strong sense of self-preservation; you notice I got the other kids to actually kick off, so if the plan backfired, they’d be blamed rather than me. They weren’t my friends, just people I was using to get the teacher fired.
Lol, your story’s funnier than mine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
idodoyouride 12:50 on April 9, 2015 Permalink |
Yes I gotta say it was hysterical at the time Lol but so not who I am today! Thanks for answering my question hun.
LikeLike
James 13:38 on April 9, 2015 Permalink |
Anytime, hun. I’m very keen to have an open dialogue with the other authors and visitors here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amaterasu Solar 20:55 on April 9, 2015 Permalink |
I am curious, James, how You approach Ethics. Do You understand Ethics at all? Do You knowingly choose unEthical behavior? Or could You constrain Yourself to Ethics? This is an important question I have about psychopaths when considering a system that does not cater to psychopaths like all money/top-down government systems do.
I would like to discover whether psychopaths can choose to remain within Ethical bounds.
LikeLike
James 12:53 on April 10, 2015 Permalink |
Interesting question, sir. Ethics are actually among my keenest academic interests, and as such I don’t believe morality exists. This being said, “choosing unethical behaviour” vs “constraining myself to ethics” doesn’t really make much sense as a decision. If you would like me to have a stab at answering the question, you’d better define what those terms mean.
The moral philosophy which makes the most logical sense to me is utilitarianism, because since ethics aren’t real, they might as well work to the benefit of the majority.
To briefly touch on your last sentence, I do certainly think it is possible to motivate psychopaths to behave the way you want them to, as long as you make the desired behaviour attractive to them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amaterasu Solar 13:42 on April 10, 2015 Permalink |
I beg to differ on the statement that Ethics “aren’t real…” [smile] If there was no Ethical seed parameter within Human society, society would not function and would never have developed. There are only three Laws in Ethics:
Were most of Us to have ignored these, We would not have developed any society at all.
I do make a distinction between morals and Ethics. Though most morals include the ideas in the Laws of Ethics, morals come often with baggage. In some places it’s VERY immoral for a woman to wear a bikini in public; other places not so much. Either way, there is nothing unEthical about doing so.
Choosing unEthical behavior means choosing to do something that breaks the three Laws, and constraining Oneself to Ethics means choosing NOT to break the three Laws.
As for making these Laws “attractive…” I am unsure how that would be done. Either a Person has the integrity to remain within these Laws or not. So maybe the question would be best asked, can a psychopath have integrity?
LikeLike
James 14:21 on April 10, 2015 Permalink |
Those laws are of your own creation aren’t they? Meaning it is you who have decided that these and only these three behaviours are so ethically offensive that they against the universal law. Very bold to assert your own preferences as absolute truth, but I like it 😉
The existence of laws requires a lawmaker. The existence of absolute laws requires a supreme lawmaker. I reject the notion that this supreme lawmaker exists therefore I reject the legitimacy of your laws. Once your laws are rejected by an individual, they can hold no power over him.
Besides, if there are only three laws, then which law defines or even creates property ownership in the first place? The definition of property cannot just be “that which it is against the law to take or damage”. When a law is broken, which law allows the ethical community to take action against the perpetrator?
Your distinction between morals and ethics is a reasonable one, but again not one which is shared by everyone. Unless you claim to speaking on behalf of a higher authority (and I have already denied the existence of such an authority), I don’t see why your personal take on ethics / morality should hold any greater sway than anyone else’s. More particularly, why should your list of laws hold universal precedence over the Ten Commandments, or over Shariah law, or over Kantian Ethics or over any other system of ethical laws that have been devised by humankind?
“I am unsure how that would be done.” Simple carrot and stick method, with much greater emphasis on the carrot than the stick because psychopaths are motivated by reward rather than punishment. If by “having integrity” you mean something like “wanting to be ethical for the ‘right reasons’ (for the sake of being ethical; to be ‘good’), rather than for selfish reasons, the answer would clearly be “no”. But motivation which appeals to self-betterment should have just as much success with psychopaths as appeal to conscience would with non-psychopaths. That is to say, not complete success with all individuals, but enough success with enough individuals to make the endeavour worthwhile.
Even though I categorically disagree with you, I’d like to nonetheless thank you for stopping by to comment and more particularly for speaking to me in a language I appreciate (that of logic rather than emotion). Feel free to rebuke me, though I may not reply immediately if at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amaterasu Solar 15:03 on April 10, 2015 Permalink |
Actually, no. These three Laws are ancient. I merely copied them. They are required as rule in society, because, as I said, without these, society would not function, having nothing to do with Gods, or “law-makers.” If We all broke the Laws willy nilly there would be no society.
What “carrot,” eh?
What would I “rebuke” You for? You are giving Me a good idea of Yur perspective, and for that alone I thank You. [smile]
LikeLike
beautifulyule 12:47 on April 11, 2015 Permalink |
Typical, psychopaths don’t respond when they get bored of societal ethics. I suspect that there are more psychopaths in the UK than any other place in the world. Probably due to an instinctual limbic brain overdrive due to lack of resources…whether perceived real or imaginary. Not expecting a response but out of curiosity what kinds of individuals do you enjoy toying with? Or shall I suggest what do psychopaths look for in targets for their amusement/boredom?
LikeLiked by 1 person
James 15:22 on April 11, 2015 Permalink |
I told him I might not respond, so it wasn’t as though it came out of the blue. I’d said what I wanted, and that’s all anyone can expect from me. Are you British then, or just trying to get a rise out of me by clinging to something which might have me affronted? 🙂
I will answer your question, but not right away as I think it would make a good blog post. So neato idea, cheers.
LikeLike
James 15:25 on April 11, 2015 Permalink |
Oh and just so you and everyone else knows, I resolve and promise to reply to everyone who leaves a comment at least once, as long as they’re not completely retarded.
LikeLike
James 14:34 on April 12, 2015 Permalink |
Oh the irony. You haven’t replied.
LikeLike
Are you my next target? | No Psychos, No Druggies, No Stooges 07:26 on May 22, 2015 Permalink |
[…] thanks to the commenter called beautifulyule, who inspired this […]
LikeLike