Tagged: love Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • GeneticPsychosMom (Tina) 13:47 on November 23, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , love, , , , , , , ,   

    Dating Site Psychopathy Exposed 

    I’m conducting experiments with men afflicted with psychopathy, and I’ve carefully observed that their brains operate along the same strand of deceitfulness. I’ll make you a list of psychopathic “sameness”. I guess that is a good descriptor of behaviors and words and activities that are weirdly associated among ALL of the psychopathic men on dating sites. Beware of some of these clues exhibited in profiles and messages from a disordered fellow:

    (I’m sorry, I don’t date women so I don’t know the psychopathic clues for them. Maybe a commenter can tell us.)

    • Love of cooking is common among them, not always a red flag, but take notice in conjunction with these other flags …
    • Love of biking extremely long distances (here in Florida anyway.)
    • Love to be adrenaline hunters.
    • Love to promise to not conduct themselves like idiots and play emotional games. Does that need saying? It’s bait for already emotionally played women desperately seeking solace.
    Come hither, damaged damsels, you’re safe with me.
    • Love of writing wordy prose that seems earnest on first glance, but is devoid of emotional content. Word salad.
    It’s ridiculous how psychopaths say the words but don’t know the music.
    Have you found that the sensuality of women is something to appreciate, you emotionless fuck?
    We” do always pick the same type of guy. You, ya trickster you.
    Good people don’t have to develop skills …to be good people.
    • Love to flat out tell you what a truly amazing guy he is and that you would be lucky to have them. Lots of them have no sense of propriety nor humility. Ugh, it’s wearying.
    • Love to send overly excited reactions to items in your profile: “OMG! I love the same things!!!!” Makes you feel real good, don’t it.
    • Love to share lengthy stories with extraneous details of their life that have no relativity to your new introductions. You’re made to feel like you’re already a close friend. “My boss’s daughter was building a house … blah blah blah …”
    • Love to talk endlessly about their numerous former relationships. This may be an attempt to groom you into behaving like a past (maybe present) girlfriend: “She would always stand at the door and wait for me to open it.” “She offered to pay for half of the meal.” Stop it, asshole, I’m not her/them. Also, bore snore.
    • Love to demand lots more pics of you immediately via text, (to add to his pic collection of gullible people).
    • Love to introduce the subject of sex really soon. I sat down for a first date lunch and before 30 minutes was up, I learned all the gory details of his S&M experiences. Boundary check much?
    • Love to call or text you early in the morning for no reason, and/or later at night than the social norm. Boundary check? Or love-bombing?
    • Love to leave you hanging, then act like nothing happened. Below is an example. Also note, this guy is pouring on the garbage and some bizarre love-bombing. How does he know that I am “truly charming” and also “so full of sensual passion”, since we only just texted boring introductions the night before? I feel really sorry for the women who fall prey to this.

    ***The disordered brain of a psychopathic trickster does not belong in any lawmaking position. I advocate psychopathy testing for political candidates.

    Learn more at DomesticEnemies.Org ***


     
    • Amaterasu Solar 11:20 on November 24, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent article! I will say… We will never convince the owners of the corporations Most call “Our governments” to test Themselves for psychopathy. They own the legal/governmental system – literally. The only winning move is not to play the game. Withdraw consent from that mess and stand sovereign on Ethical ground – much higher ground than legal/governmental, which thwarts Ethics far more than serves them.

      Liked by 1 person

      • GeneticPsychosMom (Tina) 13:35 on November 25, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        I know that you are right about the psychopaths in office not instituting a psychopathy test any time soon. They will control the discussion to get their fellows to dismiss their testing as discrimination, although it is an inhibitor of public service. For now, I am trying to get the masses to learn how real and present this neurological defect is in all of our lives… and push to scrutinize candidates more closely.

        Like

  • James 14:21 on May 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-Semitism, , demonic psychopaths, demons, , , , illuminati, love, mythbusters, myths, myths about psychopaths, myths and reality, , , neurology, , , , , psychosis, , reptiles, retards, ,   

    Mythbusting psychopathy (part the second) 

    Related image

    Here we are again, back to kick more stupid myths into the long grass where they belong.

    What myths or misconceptions about things would you like to bust, if only people would listen?

     

    MYTH: Psychopaths have no emotions.

    This is one myth psychopaths themselves (and narcissists) love to propagate to enhance their mystique, but it’s bullshit. Everyone has emotions. The only living people with no emotions are comatose or else so severely brain-damaged they can only live with the help of a life-support machine. Even dementia patients with little or no sense of self, a completely blank memory and utter dependency on caregivers show signs of emotion when properly stimulated.

    Psychopathic emotions are selfish and inward-looking. In my experience, these emotions are often fleeting and can change rapidly. Some emotions are very blunted and don’t really cause much of a change in mood, while others can be so strong they temporarily obsess or enthral the psychopath. It can also be the case that the physical signs of an emotion are there (e.g. sweaty palms, quick heart rate, out of breath) but the psychopath feels calm in themselves, in their mind.

     

    MYTH: Psychopaths are crazy, or ‘psychotic’

    Psychopathy and psychosis are two different things. Just because a word looks similar, doesn’t mean they refer to the same thing. Psychotic people are people who have lost their grip on reality; they may hear voices, hallucinate or show magical thinking. They are very much not in control of their behaviour and generally need close medical attention for their own and others’ safety. Many otherwise healthy people suffer from psychotic episodes throughout their lives, and often recover with time or medication. Schizophrenia is an example of a psychotic disorder.

    Psychopaths are fully aware of their surroundings, their behaviour and the consequences of that behaviour. Psychopaths do not have a conscience, and are not unwell in the normal sense of the word, nor will they ‘recover’ with time or medical help. As a personality disorder with roots in an individual’s genetic makeup, this is who they are for life. Both psychopaths and psychotic people can be dangerous and violent, but many are not.

    “I’m not strange, weird, off, nor crazy, my reality is just different from yours.” – the Cheshire Cat

    There is absolutely no reason I can see why a psychopath couldn’t develop a psychotic disorder separate to and unaffected by their psychopathy. This is called co-morbidity. In fact anyone can reach sub-clinical psychosis simply by staying awake for abnormally long periods of time (symptoms start kicking in beyond the 36 hour mark). I’ve tried it once or twice; it’s an interesting experience, though not an especially pleasant one. I heard shouting voices in my head and felt off balance when I tried to walk. Overall, my memory of the experience is fuzzy. Yay, temporary brain damage!

    Oh, while we’re on this subject, unlike what certain pop psychology crackpots would have you believe, “psychopathology” is not the study of psychopaths, nor is it anything whatsoever to do with psychopaths. Psychopathology is the psychiatric version of pathology, therefore it is the study of all mental illnesses and psychological disorders / abnormalities. I repeat, similar-looking words don’t always have the same meaning!

     

    MYTH: My psychopathic ex planned to ensnare, manipulate and abuse me from the start of our relationship

    Psychopaths enter relationships in a very positive frame of mind; they often love everything about the other person and are so obsessed they want to learn every tiny little detail about them, know their entire history and the full spectrum of their emotions and thoughts. In extreme cases, the psychopath may have a painful urge to possess or climb inside their new partner. They try to please the other person by mirroring them closely and being the ideal mate for them.

    After a period of time, this effort is exhausting and the other person starts to lose their appeal. Most psychopaths’ relationships stall at this point as the other person ceases to have any interest. It’s all just the same old person, same old stuff. Boredom sets in, and the psychopath either moves on without a backward glance (I prefer this), or else takes their anger and frustration out on the other person.

    I have no citation for this and am just recounting from experience; you’ll just have to take my word for it (or not). If anyone can find actual research done in this field that contradicts me and not just pull up Lovefraud or similar bilge, that would be very welcome.

     

    MYTH: Psychopaths are in all the positions of power and are the puppet masters behind an international conspiracy to bring about a new world order.

    Image result for illuminati funnyWhile there are undoubtedly psychopaths in high places, including bankers, businesspeople and world leaders, the idea of them all working together behind the scenes for not just years, but decades, is frankly absurd.

    Listen, I don’t have any evidence to back this up, but psychopaths are not nearly co-operative enough for this to work. We don’t tend to get on well with each other, and are not known for our willingness to work in teams. Every single one of the conspirators would want the top job in the Illuminati and would be working to eliminate the competition, i.e. each other. The bloody thing would not get off the ground.

    And of course, when you realise this is the exact same idea as the Evil Zionist conspiracy theory, the exact same poisonous garbage just with the word “Jew” switched for “psychopath”, you know what kind of beast you’re dealing with.

     

    MYTH: Psychopaths are lizard men in skinsuits

    No, just no. You are welcome to verify that by getting hold of your nearest psychopath and opening him up to check all his lungs and bones and whatever else you humans have inside you are in the right place. You might need the help of a surgeon, except she’ll probably be a psychopath too and will naturally be in league with one of her kind, so you see the flaw in the plan? But seriously, demonising people (even psychopaths) is, apart from being rather insulting, a lazy way out of trying to understand why others are different. Speaking of demonisation…

     

    MYTH: Psychopaths are demons from hell

    Hell is a fairy tale designed to scare the gullible into obeying the clergy – who as you’ll remember are all psychopaths of course. The idea of demons may well originate from uneducated mediaeval people’s encounters with illnesses they couldn’t explain, such as epilepsy and schizophrenia. In fact, enough ignorants are still unconvinced about this that there is a whole department of the Royal College of Surgeons dedicated to correcting idiotic superstitions among certain communities.

    Despite the hysterical imaginations of cretins who swear they’ve seen a satanic glint in the eyes of their psychopath, I assure you I am not a demon, I am a liz-… human like you (I’m assuming here. If there are any non-humans reading this, I’d love to hear from you.)

    Talk to me. Read part 1 here.

     
    • Amaterasu Solar 15:53 on May 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent article, James. Indeed, I have had many mistake psychotic with psychopathic. But I will explain that indeed there ARE psychopaths in control on this planet, who inbreed to retain the psychopathic gene. In fact, grasping that psychopaths alone would not think much past Themselves to a future They would likely not see in Their lifetime, I was at first mystified by the clear (to Me, I suppose) evidence of a very long-term plan, a generational plan, being played out before Us on the literal world stage (what We see are actors following a script written by Ones We do not see and who have the ultimate control). I have theories, and My highest probability goes to an ET influence that has these top level psychopaths convinced that They are doing “satan’s” work (“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” – Arthur C Clarke).

      Others give highest probability that it IS “satan,” or demons, or interdimensional Beings, or other metaphysical elements. As I have no evidence that such metaphysical things exist, but, in reading ancient texts and legends from around the globe, I feel I have enough to suggest ET has been interacting with Our planet a long while and that ET lives substantially longer than do We. I favor things that have 3D+T explanations, and so ET is My highest probability.

      Overall, though, a very good explanation of things.

      Like

      • James 09:43 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        Thank you for your praise, it’s always welcome. I’m glad you enjoyed the article.

        Unfortunately the rest of your comment would indicate a psychosis on your part, though I understand if you don’t see it that way. I do not believe in Satan or the supernatural, and since the validity of your claims seem to based on the assumption that both exist and play an active role in shaping the universe, I can’t possibly take your claims seriously, so won’t even pretend to.

        Don’t take this the wrong way, I still like you 🙂

        Like

        • Amaterasu Solar 11:18 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

          Hardly “psychosis.” Decades of research and a keen grasp that money promotes psychopaths to power, aiding in promoting Them to power in top-down controlmind (government) systems. You can dismiss My observations, and I will still like You as well. [smile]

          Like

      • Zachary 07:50 on May 27, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        Lmafo.
        What a twat

        Like

    • nowve666 16:22 on May 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      ROTFLMAO!!! I laughed my head off reading that. These myths that annoy me of course were funny to read about in your debunking article. I really liked what you said about relationships. That’s such a refreshing insight after all the bull about “lovebombing” as if we just stalked future love partners as prey and pretended interest (for what end?). Of course, some people could do that in order to get money from someone who has it. These people don’t need to be psychopaths. And NTs sometimes fall in love rapidly and then lose interest too. But then the person jilted can go to Lovefraud and call that person a “psychopath” whether he was or not.

      The myth about psychopaths ruling the world and causing all the problems is one I find particularly irksome. I’m glad you compared it to the anti-Semitic myths, particularly about the Rothschilds. As a Jew, I get pissed off whenever I hear this, especially when it comes from people who are otherwise politically sympathisch. I even blogged about the similarities between anti-psychopath scapegoating and the anti-Semitic kind.

      I laughed myself silly over the one about the reptiles. I think our moms would have noticed upon giving birth if their baby had scaly skin and so forth. Ditto to the one about demons. It’s human, all-too-human to want to demonize people who push our buttons. I don’t think people can face the fact that behavior they disapprove of is part of the human spectrum. I also don’t think anybody deserves to go to Hell. Not even Ronald Reagan, the person I most loath. The fact that most people (at least in the Western world) believe God, a supreme being would put anyone in such a place for all eternity only goes to show how dark the human psyche is capable of being.

      Thank you for this excellent post and for being my friend.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Amaterasu Solar 18:07 on May 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        I may point out that if psychopaths were NOT in control, thet the bulk of the planet flows to very Few here, and They choose not to truly help – 99% of money donated by ANYONE to “charities” goes to pay ridiculous salaries at the high end – and given that some of these People could end poverty ten and more times over yet choose not to…suggests psychopathy. If They were caring Beings, They would be caring for Humanity… And given the psychopathic things We see – GMO’s, “geoengineering” with toxic elements, fake events touted as “reality,” and on and on… It becomes clear the Ones at the top are, indeed, psychopaths, inbreeding to retain the psychopath gene.

        Like

        • nowve666 18:52 on May 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply

          There is a basic logical error here. You point out that there are lots of things wrong with the world we live in.
          Then you jump to the conclusion that it must be because psychopaths are in control of the world. What you are missing is a causal link between these two propositions. You assume that anyone who does anything wrong or unethical must be a psychopath. If that were true, there would be many more psychopaths than the 1% estimated by the experts. Have you looked at the PCL-R, the “gold standard” test for psychopathy? There are 20 items on the list. You only mention one: lack of caring.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Amaterasu Solar 11:15 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

            The causal link? Money. The accounting for Human energy added into the system, required to survive. “If You have to account for Your energy to anOther to survive, You are NOT free; You are a slave.”

            That power over Others that money provides is what give the psychopaths in control the drive to get it and retain it. Money systems promote psychopaths to power.

            Like

            • nowve666 12:16 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

              So only psychopaths go for money? Psychopaths like money. Nons also like money. Don’t tell me you don’t like money, Amaterasu. Everyone likes money. That doesn’t mean that everyone has money. Nor have you shown that have more than anyone else. Psychopaths exist on every level of the class structure. What “decades of research?” And doesn’t money promote whomever has it to power, psychopath or not?

              You talk about ETs but offered no evidence that ETs are working with psychopaths. I don’t think you’re psychotic. I just think you need to study the syllogism. Wikipedia says, “A syllogism (Greek: συλλογισμός syllogismos, ‘conclusion, inference’) is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.” You start with a premise. For example, if your premise is “only psychopaths seek and get money,” then follow it with “only people with money have power,” your conclusion can be “psychopaths have all the power.” But your first premise is wrong. Psychopaths are not the only ones who seek and get money (and power). Therefore, your syllogism breaks down.

              Like

              • Amaterasu Solar 14:47 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

                I did not say only psychopaths go for money – surely We all do as that is how We survive on this planet. BUT, psychopaths are the Ones who will do ANYTHING to get money/power over Others. And They do, accumulating money/power over Others far more than Others who have limits to what They will do for it, because of conscience and caring.

                And I don’t think the THEORY of ET needs proof. Geez. Did You notice I gave it as a theory based on ancient texts and legends. If I had proof, it wouldn’t be a theory, now would it. I am just saying that the plans, the scripts written, are clearly generational. And without some long-term direction, psychopaths would not work for things that are beyond Their life span. Ergo I THEORIZE an ET involvement on this planet. A PSYCHOPATHIC ET involvement.

                Like

                • nowve666 16:16 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

                  Ama, your proposition that “psychopaths are the Ones who will do ANYTHING to get money/power over Others,” must be based on the fact that we do not have a conscience. Since freedom from conscience enables us to do anything, you assume that we WILL do anything to get money/power. I addressed that issue in my blog at https://kiasherosjourney.wordpress.com/2016/04/16/free-to-choose/ where I pointed out the freedom to do something doesn’t mean that we will inevitably do it. There are reasons why a psychopath wouldn’t “do anything for money.” In my case, I never really cared about money as long as I had enough to satisfy my rather modest desires. Sure, I could hold up a liquor store, I suppose. That would get me more money but it could also get me a stretch of prison time. I don’t want money that badly. Furthermore, as James and I have both tried to point out, non-psychopaths can and have done terrible things for money. If they are not psychopaths, they probably feel guilty afterwards. Having a conscience doesn’t prevent everyone from doing wrong. You just can’t assume someone is a psychopath because he has done something you consider terrible. That’s why they have tests and expert diagnoses.

                  I wasn’t poo-pooing the idea that there are extra-terrestrials. I just think the idea that they are in league with psychopaths is far-fetched.

                  Like

                  • Amaterasu Solar 16:58 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

                    I am not saying that ALL psychopaths WILL do that. I am saying that MANY of Them will. While Those who are not psychopaths will stop short, in high probability, thereby giving the many psychopaths that will do anything the upper hand in gaining power over Others. Ergo, money systems promote psychopaths. And money long ago promoted certain families (ones We seldom hear of, even) to the top, and They inbreed to retain the gene, and have a generational plan to take over the planet – and the reason I give highest probability for Them doing this is that there is some influence that is directing Them, that has a longer life span than Us Humans. Else there would be no such “new world order” plan.

                    Like

                    • James 18:03 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

                      But there is no “new world order” plan, so that solves that 😛

                      Trust me, Amy, we do not have enough family loyalty to spend our lives on a plan that only our great-great-great-grandchildren might benefit from. Your theory of psychopathic families hatching a plot over centuries doesn’t hold water. Now there may be a type of personality that does behave in that way, but they are not psychopaths because their behaviour is illogical from a psychopathic point of view. If I’m going to enact a new world order to put me in charge of planet Earth, I’m going to do it now, while I’m still around to enjoy it. Fuck future generations, I wouldn’t even share power with my living family, nevermind some hypothetical descendants.

                      As for being directed by ET; fuck ET! ET would be my bitch, not the other way around.

                      Like

                      • Amaterasu Solar 19:05 on May 13, 2017 Permalink

                        That’s why We can find “leaders” like George H W Bush talking about it. MANY of Them have brought up the NWO. So I guess We can concluded it’s fictional, right? Do a search for quote “New World Order” and see just how many “leaders” have brought it up.

                        Like

                      • nowve666 20:54 on May 13, 2017 Permalink

                        Our money has “Novus Ordo Seclorum” under a truncated pyramid. I guess that’s Latin for “New World Order” “Thus the motto Novus ordo seclorum can be translated as “A new order of the ages.” It was proposed by Charles Thomson, the Latin expert who was involved in the design of the Great Seal of the United States, to signify “the beginning of the new American Era” as of the date of the Declaration of Independence.” So this is a very old thing. Dates all the way back to the Declaration of Independence. You think the Founding Fathers were psychopaths?

                        Seriously, Amy. The “New World Order” is talked about a lot. But that doesn’t make it any more “real” than the Illuminati nor God, for that matter. These things have a certain meaning but not the conspiratorial one that’s so popular on the internet. And, as James said, psychopaths are not into that kind of sacrificial planning that would be needed to build some future dystopia. We’re more into the here and now.

                        Like

                      • James 03:59 on May 14, 2017 Permalink

                        The “NWO” mentioned on your banknotes is, and always was, the shifting of power away from the old world of empires and kings and towards the New World, i.e. America. That has pretty much happened over the past 200 years, and now the pendulum is swinging the other way, back east and towards Asia for the first time in about six centuries. I’d say the “New” World Order was a bit past its sell by date, wouldn’t you?

                        Liked by 1 person

                      • nowve666 13:14 on May 14, 2017 Permalink

                        My point. The NWO is nothing new. Just as the Illuminati was an ancient order in Bavaria that had nothing to do with the conspiracy theories, the NWO is basically a concept politicians can now evoke when needed. It can mean whatever someone wants it to mean.

                        Like

                      • Amaterasu Solar 08:33 on May 14, 2017 Permalink

                      • James 03:54 on May 14, 2017 Permalink

                        Or you could show me a video clip of at least one leader mentioning it 🙂

                        Anyway, you fixated on the least important part of my comment. Fact is, I can’t prove there’s no NWO conspiracy (just as you can’t prove there is one), but I have made a good stab at proving it’s not psychopaths. How about addressing that, largest and most important point of my comment?

                        Like

      • James 09:54 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        Yes, when I hatched out of my egg, my mother was quick to dismiss any fleeting similarities between myself and Gary, our pet gecko.

        Hell is a brutal concept really, and I can see how people might believe it justified for really horrible individuals to go there for a limited period of time, but an eternity of neverending torture seems unjustly cruel even for someone like Stalin or Hitler (or Reagan). I can understand centuries, maybe even millennia, of agonising punishment being reasonably well-deserved, but an eternity? God is one cold motherfucker. It’s ridiculously out of proportion to any evil even the worst human is capable of committing.

        Liked by 1 person

        • nowve666 10:08 on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

          Right. As mortals, we are incapable of infinite evil. We are finite. Infinite punishment for finite crimes is absurd.

          Like

    • Amaterasu Solar 17:17 on May 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Well this is weird. I got an email of a post here by nowve666 discussing the cremation of care ceremony at Bohemian Grove (something I already knew about this), and other stuff which She rightly points out supports My research on the psychopaths in control. But when I get here… It’s not. Can’t see it anywhere. Any clue what’s up there?

      Liked by 1 person

    • nowve666 17:52 on May 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Amy, I can’t see it either. How weird. Maybe James didn’t approve it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jul 11:24 on October 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Construct a box. Any box. Make it any size or shape you want. Set up studies but ensure that they take place withon the space occupied by that box. You will be a smart intelligent person, as long as you only venture within that box. The moment you step outside of that box, you are worse than useless.
      The best trap is the one you put up yourself, epecially one that is set up to mimic your mental capacities and patterns as much as possible.

      I have said before that psychopathy isn’t really a thing. Don’t believe me. What can you do with it that is beneficial? Is it something to be feared or detested? Does it assist you in life?

      Grab some history books and study them. You’ll be surprised. But I’ll save you buying at least one book.

      Only Clergy could read in 15th Century. Nicholas Copernicus was a clergyman. He discovered the earth rotates around the sun. He waited until a few weeks before his death to release the manuscript. He knew what would happen.
      Without a knowledge of history, you only have your box of constructed knowledge not based on reality. Crippling your social ability under a self imposed social stigma, without even getting paid to do it, doesn’t seem smart to me. If somwone is giving me a handicap to fail, they should be paying me for it.

      As for psychopathy? One can create ideas, including such an idea as psychopathy.

      Like

      • GeneticPsychosMom (Tina) 13:58 on October 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        Hi Jul, people have a neurological condition from birth called psychopathy. It can be viewed on MRI scans. It’s a scientific fact, so I don’t “believe” you.

        Like

    • Jul 19:36 on October 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Aren’t you planning to get them put away? How do you propose to get someone to give up their life or their ability to succeed? Isn’t a pursuit of destruction of wholesale ability of others a criminal or insane goal as itself?

      Like

  • James 19:51 on December 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Berlin, , , Europe, Germany, love, , , , , , , Xmas   

    Psychopath's Christmas message 

    In the wake of yet another terror attack on European soil, and the end of a rather crummy year for anyone framing themselves as any way liberal, progressive (or indeed as a decent human being), it’s easy to feel disheartened about the future, as though there is no hope. Well there is something you can do, and it’s easy.

    The Syrian civil war, which has so far claimed almost half a million lives has, after five years of brutal fighting, near enough come full circle this week, with President Assad’s forces retaking the rest of Aleppo that had been in rebel hands. What a tragic waste of life, and what a scandal that this has been allowed (made) to happen under our noses. That NATO and Russia have backed opposing sides and are at this stage fighting a proxy war against each other is no secret. The age of relative peace and prosperity some of us have enjoyed for the last few decades seems to be heading in a bloody change of direction.

    Certainly, soon-to-be President Trump’s tweets about bringing back nuclear weapons in a big way is enough to send even a fearless psychopath running to his duvet, as this is surely very bad news indeed for those of us who value peace.

    And then there’s ISIS. They, and terrorism in general, seem to sum up this era we’re living in rather well. They’re international, they appeal to the young and disenfranchised, they use social media as a powerful tool of propaganda, and they’re populist.

    The stereotypical westerner’s reaction, one of fear, a sense of helplessness and an increasingly paranoid and vicious popular feeling against Islam and Muslims, plays into ISIS hands very well. We also do those illiberal, authoritarian control freaks in governments a huge favour. In our fear, and our clamour for security at any cost, we risk handing over all the reins of power to maniacs who will bring nothing but misery. Oh wait, that should have been last year’s Christmas warning, because in America at least, that horse has already bolted…

    But let’s focus on terrorism. The thing about terrorism, what makes it such an effective method of war and why it will probably never be beaten by force, is an individual terrorist only has to ‘get it right’ once. Security forces have to get it right every single time. If they slip up, like they did in Berlin this week, people die.

    Against those odds, it is clear that successful terror attacks are inevitable. Even with the very best security personnel, and the very worst draconian anti-liberal laws, an attack will always occur sooner or later.

    So if fighting is useless, what else can be done? Well, there’s always good old fashioned fear. But no! We can’t respond to such horror with kneejerk reactions and a fearful outlook on the world beyond our front rooms. We shouldn’t build walls and spurn those who are different from us. We should not react with hostility to refugees, Muslims, or foreigners with suspicion or hatred. All of that plays into the hands of terrorists. Terrorists – and nefarious politicians – don’t want peace and goodwill to all men, they want us to be at each other’s throats – christians, muslims, jews, atheists, rich, poor, right, left, you name it.

    The real solution is deceptively simple, but in practise so very complicated.

    The only hope of putting a stop to terrorism and, more widely *all* conflict, forever is to embrace peace.

    This is the most difficult thing in the world, something which will take generations and centuries to achieve and which has every chance of failing. Why? Because it involves talking to, empathising with and building friendships alongside enemies. As a species, we’re not very good at that, but it emphatically is within our skillset. To use just one example, the Troubles in Northern Ireland didn’t cease because one side knocked the other out with superior firepower. No, the IRA and the British government sat down, around a table, and talked to each other – one adversary to another. They talked, they negotiated and they showed willingness to compromise. The solution they came up with (the Good Friday Agreement) isn’t perfect and doesn’t satisfy everyone’s wishes, but it is good enough that the fighting has more or less finished.

    It sounds sanctimonious, and it is. Nonetheless, we have to come together as a species, to love one another, to treat each other with kindness and forgiveness even when we really don’t want to. All of us have to agree that violence, fighting and killing just is wrong, and everyone has to agree not to engage in it, because if everyone (and I do mean everyone) refused to fight, there would be no war.

    You see what I mean? It’s so simple, yet it’s going to be practically impossible to achieve. In the short to medium term, the strong likelihood is that we’re going to carry on making the wrong decisions. The way current affairs are going, things could get a whole lot worse before they get better. But that doesn’t stop you or I from individually making the decision to spurn conflict and embrace peace. Every great movement has to start small, so why not you? Why not us? Why not now?

    Merry Christmas, happy Hanukkah, happy solstice, yuletide greetings, enjoy the season – to all and any with the patience to read this post to the end.

    Be kind, and love one another.

     
    • liferolle 02:13 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      WOah where you been. It’s all about programming and one world agenda. Coming soon. That’s what I learnt along the way anyway. Plus christ mass is a satanic practice and always was long before the commercial Side of shit.

      Liked by 1 person

      • James 04:53 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        Hi Luverly 🙂 Nonetheless, Satan or no Satan, I hope you enjoy the next couple of days and you’re in a good place.

        Liked by 1 person

    • nowve666 08:58 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Merry Christmas, James. Did you draw that picture? Lovely. You sure are full of surprises.

      Like

      • James 10:34 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        Don’t be absurd, it sure wasn’t me. Merry Christmas, Fran.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Amaterasu Solar 12:53 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Seems most everything You brought up there is/was a psyop to create fear… ISIS is a CIA/Mossad construct (investigation offers evidence that this is so), existing in photo ops and “news” stories only. I could go on, pointing to the magic murder of ambassadors that do not bleed, gunmen that go from freshly shaved when shooting ambassadors to 5 o’clock shadows in a matter of minutes when They are “taken out…” But You will merely call My critical thinking “paranoia” or some such. LOL! Whatever. Do enjow the season, James.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Amaterasu Solar 12:55 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        er…enjoy! Must proofread, I must!

        Like

      • James 15:57 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        The thing about your theory is even if it’s true, it doesn’t matter. No matter who the ‘enemy’ really is, the only antidote is universal peace, through respect and love. So in that spirit, I wish you all the best for the holiday season, and a healthy and happy new year.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Amaterasu Solar 16:23 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

          Actually, since the foundational problem on this planet is that the systems We consent to promote psychopaths, and the “antidote” is to quit consenting to such systems and consent to ways that promote the caring Ones to take care of things. “If You want peace, take the PROFIT out of war…”

          I chuckle a bit at a psychopath suggesting the solution involves love… But I will say, I care about You (however much You don’t care really about Me). May Your coming years bring satisfaction and comfort, James.

          Liked by 1 person

          • James 18:16 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

            And I have to chuckle at your caring about me when I have given you no reason to do so. That’s not really because of psychopathy, just that we’re total strangers. But feel free (I know you will do what you feel like anyway, so my ‘permission’ won’t mean anything to you!), and have a happy Christmas.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Amaterasu Solar 18:32 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

              Interesting fact about Me, James. I care about everyOne I interact with, whether I like Them or not (and I happen to like much of what I see in what You present). I care about Humanity as a whole and work to free all of Us to lives of leisure and industry of interest. [hugs]

              Like

              • James 18:39 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                I care about humanity as a whole, but not that much about individuals, especially strangers.

                Liked by 1 person

                • Amaterasu Solar 19:17 on December 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  Somehow, James, I don’t think of You as a stranger. One I have never met in the flesh, granted, but You have offered enough of Your thoughts that I feel Our minds have met, if only briefly. [smile]

                  Like

                  • James 18:07 on December 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                    I don’t think they ever have. I say that not to contradict you for the sake of it, merely to tell you the truth.

                    Like

    • Andrew 18:27 on December 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Like

      • Amaterasu Solar 20:46 on December 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        Quite curious… What do You have to substantiate that freedom must be earned on a planet We were born to without Our consent, and which was stolen from Us through “trusts” and deceit?

        Like

      • James 18:05 on December 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        If you wish to write essays, you should get your own blog, rather than commenting on mine. I haven’t the time nor the interest to read whatever you wrote, but if you think you’ve got something to say which others will appreciate reading, set up a blog. Since the consensus on here is that you’re a psychopath, we’ll even provide a link in our sidebar so our readers can go and see what you’ve got to say.

        Like

    • Andrew 21:20 on December 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Your own life is proof of that. The moment you are free of your own family, you must make your own way. That is all the proof you need to know that the only guarantee you ever get, is that you are guaranteed a right to life. The other rights, you must earn, on the merits of the success towards goals using your own efforts. When people stop being successful in life, they can be ruined and lose their freedom to the court system, to drugs or to those who take advantage of them.

      Like

      • Amaterasu Solar 22:03 on December 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        That is only if We presume that things are best done the way they are being done, consenting to that way of doing things. The twin towers to psychopaths in power were set up by psychopaths to manipulate and control Us on OUR planet, making Us believe, through indoctrination , that this is the best of all possible ways We could do things. Frankly, I don’t consent to any of it, and work to topple those two towers such that We are no longer slave to the useless eliters, and ALL may live lives of leisure and industry of interest on this vastly abundant planet that could support 1000 times the number here now. Those two towers are top-down controlmind (government), and accounting for Human energy added into the system that accounts for Human energy added and moves the bulk of OUR wealth on this planet to very few psychopaths (money system).

        Sure, if We accept these, We must follow the rules the psychopaths in control put in place. I do not accept them. I do not consent. I consent to better ways, which I discuss at length in many short articles on My forum.

        Like

        • James 18:19 on December 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

          I have to admire you, Amy. You spend so much time trying to convince people who will likely never agree with or support you (i.e. Andrew and myself). That’s so much harder than “preaching to the converted”, and like I said, really must be admired, if nothing else.

          Like

          • Amaterasu Solar 23:05 on December 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

            I anticipate other readers… [smile] Truth told, I don’t care about whether I “win You over” (or whether You admire Me… LOL!). I enjoy placing the ideas out there for Those who read and might grasp that the foundational problem on this planet is psychopaths in control and that the systems We are consenting to promote Them, so no surprise They ARE in control. Maybe Some will also withdraw consent, share awareness, get Us closer to the tipping point.

            Liked by 1 person

    • Andrew 00:26 on December 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      I have pretty much summed up everything I had to say during the time that I posted information. It’s unlikely I would start a blog because I don’t find it interesting to talk about myself at all. As far as discussing things are concerned, you will usually be talking at someone’s level of agreement. There is no need, from my end of things, to distract from the subject matter at hand, and it is with this end that one learns to “let sleeping dogs lie”.
      I have learnt quite a bit in the last couple of months that I did not know before. I am definitely better off for having come here and found out what I did. I would hope that someone somewhere, in the now, or the future to come, will find something that will make things a bit clearer, and easier to understand. And with that, you are to find, that I am moving on, to other things.

      Like

      • James 04:40 on December 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        It’s like reading a Boris Johnson speech.

        Like

    • Andrew 01:51 on December 31, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      At least Boris Johnson is a colorful individual. He has lotsof entertainment value. Unlike, for instance, Teresa Vague. There are no psychopaths here. No psychopath would post the stuff that you, James, post. You are a narcissist, without a doubt. As are the “psychopaths” here. This blog should be named: Narcissist Central. No need to worry because a lot of narcissists think they are psychopaths and start blogs about the wonders of psychopathy…ha! The prevailing theme that runs through the whole site, whether empath or not, is a weird sense of entitlement, as though your empathy, or lack of it, it itself confers upon you certain rights to a special group. Only a narcissist, and a special kind of weird “empathy” would come up with that “innocent” view.

      Keep drinking the cool aid. I wrote what I wrote with very good reason. Only some people would see what was written. The rest of them, would literally, blank out, like you did, James. So thanks a lot. In any case, my information is there and I wrote it for a reason, and none of you people were that reason.

      Like I said before, I have gained a lot of information from your blog. I do sincerely thank you. Without your blog it would have taken me longer to realize that some people are beyond redemption and are better left alone to wallow in their own misery. Don’t worry. More misery awaits you down the road. There are always worse things to come for you who looks for them. If you don’t have enough, you could make up some more until you really go bonkers and then you will be in hell. No, ahem.., I meant heaven

      Like

      • James 11:01 on December 31, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        I thought you were fucking off? Go on then, off you pop.

        Liked by 2 people

      • @GeneticPsycho (Tina) 21:34 on January 2, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        More misery down the road, huh? Psychopaths don’t know misery. I’m no psychopath and I don’t know this misery thing. Why on earth would I be miserable? Glad to be of service to your awakening to the fact that people are beyond redemption. This is not news to me. It does not stop me from doing my humble part at promoting psychopathy awareness, anyway. Don’t worry, be happy.

        Like

      • nowve666 21:31 on February 15, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        You, Andrew, are probably a narcissist. But I wonder what you fancy yourself as. Since you think you know what a psychopath would post and what he wouldn’t post, I wonder if you think you are one. How else could you know what a psychopath would post?

        Like

    • Andrew 00:09 on January 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I keep threatening to fuck off, but just can’t seem to manage it. I have a constant need to be the centre of attention and to talk shit about people I’ve never met. This is because I have no life; I spend my days trolling people on various websites.

      Liked by 1 person

      • @GeneticPsycho (Tina) 08:41 on January 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        Some psychopaths are more narcissistic than others. Some are more jovial and fun-loving. Some are more serious and morbid. There is a variety, just like in the rest of the population. How many psychopaths do you know? Because you can’t paint them all with the same brush.

        Like

      • @GeneticPsycho (Tina) 10:52 on January 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        Andrew, your “trolling” does not bother me. I am curious to know what gets you up in the morning? What is your motivation for proceeding through your day and doing it again tomorrow? If you are so inclined to answer?

        Like

    • Andrew 10:36 on January 15, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I like to play

      Like

    • andy 13:11 on March 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      No such thing as a psychopath. But there are reactionists and special flakes which comprises most of those who are here. Basically, a site full of losers who post bullshit.

      Liked by 1 person

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: